Downloadable Software (DS) is a rapidly growing company providing high quality software. You've come to the right place if you need professionally implemented programming solutions for all kinds of usage. Thousands of contented customers have already benefited from our products and solutions. Hundreds are joining this community every day.
We deliver superior soft and services that empower our partners and customers to dramatically improve their development, deployment, integration and management of quality applications worldwide.VIEW ALL PRODUCTSMost popular OEM products:Microsoft Windows Vista Business
Retail Price $299.00
Our $79.95Microsoft Office 2007 Enterprise
Retail Price $899.00
Our $79.95Macromedia Dreamweaver 8
Retail Price $399.99
Our $49.95Adobe Creative Suite 2 Premium for Windows
Retail Price $1199.00
Our $149.95Microsoft Office 2003 Professional with Business Contact Manager for Outlook
Retail Price $550.00
Our $69.95Adobe Illustrator CS2
Retail Price $499.00
Our $59.95 Adobe Premiere 2.0
Retail Price $849.00
Our $59.95 CorelDraw Graphics Suite X3
Retail Price $399.00
Our $59.95 Macromedia Studio 8
Retail Price 999.00
Our 99.95 Autodesk AutoCAD 2007
Retail Price $3995.00
Our $129.95Intuit QuickBooks 2006 Premier Edition
Retail Price $399.95
Our $69.95 Avid Liquid Pro 7
Retail Price $999.00
Our $69.95Adobe Acrobat 8.0 Professional
Retail Price $449.00
Our $79.95Microsoft Money Home & Business 7
Retail Price $89.90
Our $39.95 MS \/\/indo\/\/s XP Professional with SP2
Retail Price $269.99
Our $49.95Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0
Retail Price $599.00
Our $69.95 Micrîsoft Office XP Professional
Retail Price $499.00
Our $49.95VIEW ALL PRODUCTS
Hello,
While attempting to use Clarify on a set of models imputed from the most recent version of Amelia, I run into error r(4) "no; data in memory would be lost" whenever I use the estsimp command (for refrence, I was using "estsimp weibull y x, mi(file) ). When I save my data and attempt to do this again, Stata changes the names of my variables in such a way as to make it incompatible with my Amelia sheets. I have successfully gone through this process before, but after installing the newest version of Amelia, I began having this problem. As far as I can tell, my variable names follow the conventions in the Stata manual.
As always, thanks for the assistance.
-IM
--
Clarify mailing list served by Harvard-MIT Data Center
[Un]Subscribe/View Archive: http://lists.gking.harvard.edu/?info=clarify
Dear Clarify List Members,
I have some trouble using the code to produce the „figure 1“ in the clarify article. I guess that my problem is that i use a variable to be plotted on the x-axis that only ranges form 0 to 11. When I use the code pasted below I only get 10 confidence intervals plotted in my graph. I don’t know if this matters but the variable which I’m interested in is a discrete one.
I’m not sure if I set the values in the “gen xaxis” and the local commands right.
And for what is the function of the “`a'“?
-----------------------------------
clear
use p1imp_mn1
estsimp reg depvariable setof_independend variables, mi(setofdatafiles)
gen plo = .
gen phi = .
gen xaxis=_n + 1 in 1/11
setx mean
local a=0
while `a'<=11 {
setx variableofinterest `a'
simqi, ev genev(margins)
_pctile margins, p(.5,99.5)
replace plo=r(r1) if xaxis==`a'
replace phi=r(r2) if xaxis==`a'
drop margins
local a = `a' + 1
}
sort xaxis
graph twoway rcap plo phi xaxis
-----------------------------
Maybe that it seems I little basic but I would appreciate any help.
Tim
--
"Feel free" - 5 GB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS/Monat ...
Jetzt GMX ProMail testen: www.gmx.net/de/go/mailfooter/promail-out
--
Clarify mailing list served by Harvard-MIT Data Center
[Un]Subscribe/View Archive: http://lists.gking.harvard.edu/?info=clarify
Dear Clarify List Members,
I have some trouble using the code to produce the „figure 1“ in the clarify article. I guess that my problem is that i use a variable to be plotted on the x-axis that only ranges form 0 to 11. When I use the code pasted below I only get 10 confidence intervals plotted in my graph. I don’t know if this matters but the variable which I’m interested in is a discrete one.
I’m not sure if I set the values in the “gen xaxis” and the local commands right.
And for what is the function of the “`a'“?
-----------------------------------
clear
use p1imp_mn1
estsimp reg depvariable setof_independend variables, mi(setofdatafiles)
gen plo = .
gen phi = .
gen xaxis=_n + 1 in 1/11
setx mean
local a=0
while `a'<=11 {
setx variableofinterest `a'
simqi, ev genev(margins)
_pctile margins, p(.5,99.5)
replace plo=r(r1) if xaxis==`a'
replace phi=r(r2) if xaxis==`a'
drop margins
local a = `a' + 1
}
sort xaxis
graph twoway rcap plo phi xaxis
Maybe that it seems I little basic but I would appreciate any help.
Tim
--
"Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ...
Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: www.gmx.net/de/go/mailfooter/topmail-out
--
Clarify mailing list served by Harvard-MIT Data Center
[Un]Subscribe/View Archive: http://lists.gking.harvard.edu/?info=clarify
17 years, 1 month
2
1
by Israel.Marques.II＠Dartmouth.EDU
Hello,
I am conducting a project which seeks to analyze survival amongst Communist regimes and am having a little bit of trouble getting Clarify to work with my data. My variables are as follows:
Country: Name of the country (15 different countries)
Year: varies from 1978-1991
Transition: coded 0 for non-event and 1 for event
Electrical_Production: varies from 1 to 1000 (billions of kWh)
Whenever I try to get Clarify to use the weibull model in order to estimate a model where transition is the dependent variable, I always end up with an error message that says "Transition <= 0 in some observations". I've checked the data itself to make sure there is nothing in it (stringed variables, etc.) that State might not like and there is nothing there. Clarify runs perfectly if I try using a non-weibull model. I assume I'm making some sort of coding error. How do I code a non-transition? I think my use of zero is a problem here. Any help would be vastly appreciated.
-IM
--
Clarify mailing list served by Harvard-MIT Data Center
[Un]Subscribe/View Archive: http://lists.gking.harvard.edu/?info=clarify
