Dear Gary,
I hate to bother you with some questions, but I am having no luck getting an answer from anyone else.
Friends are sending me articles that are supposed to answer my questions, but they do not. I recently attended a talk you gave
At my school-Univ. of South Carolina. As with every other talk I have heard from you, I was motivated to make a change and do things differently. Unfortunately, I am stuck with some questions that no one seems able to answer.
I do large N analysis of wars, where most observations are zeroes. Your recent talk at USC was about matching and it sounded like RELogit had multiple benefits, including creating a more balanced sample. My understanding was the sample analyzed would consist of an equal number of events and non-events. . I hope I have interpreted this correctly.
That is not the main reason for my email to you. I have been struggling all week to try to figure out whether I really need to use Fixed or random effects in my analysis. As you know, I cannot run them in the RELogit program, but it seems like it is something reviewers want to see. I wondered whether there is a reason you excluded them from your program-for example, because you thought they were unnecessary with your program. I know that it is still possible to use clustering, but that does not do the exact same thing as fe and re.
I would appreciate any guidance about your thinking about my using RELogit for my main analysis and not using fe or re.
Thank you in advance for your assistance. I really appreciate it.
Best wishes,
Katherine Barbieri
Katherine Barbieri
Associate Professor
Department of Political Science
University of South Carolina
Columbia, SC 29205
Email: Katherine.barbieri(a)sc.edu<mailto:Katherine.barbieri@sc.edu>
Tel: (803) 467-3912 (cell); (803) 777-6902 (office)
http://people.cas.sc.edu/barbierk/
Dear friend,
I'm sorry but happy to inform you about my success in getting those funds transferred under the cooperation of a new partner from Vietnam though i tried my best to involve you in the business but God decided the whole situations. Presently I'm in Vietnam for investment projects with my own share of the total sum. Meanwhile, I didn't forget your past efforts and attempts to assist me in transferring those funds despite that it failed us some how.
Now contact my secretary in Burkina Faso Is name is Mr. Loan Ismail on his e-mail address below ( loanismail(a)gmail.com ) Ask him to send you the total of $200.000.00 which i kept for your compensation for all the past efforts and attempts to assist me in this matter. I appreciated your efforts at that time very much. So feel free and get in touched with my secretary Mr. Loan Ismail and instruct him where to send the amount to you. Please do let me know immediately you receive it so that we can share the joy after all the sufferness at that time.
In the moment, I'm very busy here because of the investment projects which I and the new partner are having at hand, finally, remember that I had forwarded instruction to the secretary on your behalf to receive that money, so feel free to get in touch with Mr. Loan Ismail . he will send the amount to you without any delay.
Regards,
Mr. Mohammed Ibrahim
Dear friend,
I'm sorry but happy to inform you about my success in getting those funds transferred under the cooperation of a new partner from Vietnam though i tried my best to involve you in the business but God decided the whole situations. Presently I'm in Vietnam for investment projects with my own share of the total sum. Meanwhile, I didn't forget your past efforts and attempts to assist me in transferring those funds despite that it failed us some how.
Now contact my secretary in Burkina Faso Is name is Mr. Loan Ismail on his e-mail address below ( loanismail(a)gmail.com ) Ask him to send you the total of $200.000.00 which i kept for your compensation for all the past efforts and attempts to assist me in this matter. I appreciated your efforts at that time very much. So feel free and get in touched with my secretary Mr. Loan Ismail and instruct him where to send the amount to you. Please do let me know immediately you receive it so that we can share the joy after all the sufferness at that time.
In the moment, I'm very busy here because of the investment projects which I and the new partner are having at hand, finally, remember that I had forwarded instruction to the secretary on your behalf to receive that money, so feel free to get in touch with Mr. Loan Ismail . he will send the amount to you without any delay.
Regards,
Mr. Mohammed Ibrahim
Dear all,
Is there a relogit (for Stata 11) post-estimation command, an analogue to
estat class for logit on Stata? I want to calculate the percentage of
cases correctly predicted, and couldn't see if there was a command to
do it nicely.
Kind regards,
Cecilia Osorio
Dear all,
Is there a relogit (for Stata 11) post-estimation command, an analogue to
estat class for logit on Stata? I want to calculate the percentage of
cases correctly predicted, and couldn't see if there was a command to
do it nicely.
Kind regards,
Cecilia Osorio
Unsubscribe me from this
listhttp://braindr.biz/info/unsubscribe.php?M=2008888&C=aa55e15196f30ed7dd896c6d399f04d9&L=38&N=34
Late call for abstract
Early-Bird Registration
to the
Jerusalem International conference
June 2013
on
Neuro-plasticity and Cognitive Modifiabilty
"The role of Cognitive Intention in the Shaping of the Wo/Man"
Link for details:
www.brainconvention.net
Powered by Interspire
Hi all:
I have performed relogit with my variables successfully,
however, when I keep adding interaction items to see the moderation
effect, the error message occurs,
It says "matrix has missing values" whereas I am sure the interaction
variable has no missing value.
Does anyone know how to solve this problem?
p.s the two variables are both binary (0,1), thus the interaction term is
also binary
Thanks!
--
RungTai Wu
Ph.D Candidate
National Tsing Hua University
Institute of Technology Management
Email: rungtai(a)gmail.com
Mobile: 886-910706892
I'm new to R, so please excuse the question.
I have a large number of explanatory variables and R allows a shorthand of the form 'Y ~ .'
zelig gives an error when the model is "relogit":
Error in terms.formula(tmp, simplify = TRUE) :
'.' in formula and no 'data' argument
The full form of the command that I used is:
z.out <- zelig (Y ~ ., model="relogit", tau = NULL, robust = FALSE, data = d)
Any help is appreciated.
Best,
Lal
Dear Prof. King,
I use relgoit to analyze two different kind of events (e.g. promotion of male and female workers) with two different dataset (groups).
group 1(all information about male): relogit y1 x1 x2, wc(.###)
group 2(all information about female): relogit y2 x1 x2, wc(.$$$)
Now I want to do a beta difference test to see on which on the two dependent variables a single independent variable has more impact.
e.g (b1 – b2)
z = --------------------
√(se(b1)2 + se(b2)2)
Can I do that? If yes, what should I need to notice? Suppose the significance level and sign of x1 and x2 are the same across models.
Any help will be very very appreciated!
Best regards,
Xiaoming Sun
Email: sun.qqhr(a)yahoo.com.cn; sun.413(a)stu.xjtu.edu.cn
Phone No: (+86)15109263565
School of Management
Xi’an Jiaotong University
China
Best regards,
Xiaoming Sun
Email: sun.qqhr(a)yahoo.com.cn; sun.413(a)stu.xjtu.edu.cnPhone No: (+86)15109263565
School of Management
Xi’an Jiaotong University
China